↓ Skip to main content

Toxins induce ‘malaise’ behaviour in the honeybee (Apis mellifera)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Toxins induce ‘malaise’ behaviour in the honeybee (Apis mellifera)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00359-014-0932-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Hurst, Philip C. Stevenson, Geraldine A. Wright

Abstract

To avoid poisoning and death when toxins are ingested, the body responds with a suite of physiological detoxification mechanisms accompanied by behaviours that in mammals often include vomiting, nausea, and lethargy. Few studies have characterised whether insects exhibit characteristic 'malaise-like' behaviours in response to intoxication. Here, we used the honeybee to investigate how intoxication produced by injection or ingestion with three toxins with different pharmacological modes of action quinine, amygdalin, and lithium chloride affected behaviour. We found that toxin-induced changes in behaviour were best characterised by more time spent grooming. Bees also had difficulty performing the righting reflex and exhibited specific toxin-induced behaviours such as abdomen dragging and curling up. The expression of these behaviours also depended on whether a toxin had been injected or ingested. When toxins were ingested, they were least 10 times less concentrated in the haemolymph than in the ingested food, suggesting that their absorption through the gut is strongly regulated. Our data show that bees exhibit changes in behaviour that are characteristic of 'malaise' and suggest that physiological signalling of toxicosis is accomplished by multiple post-ingestive pathways in animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,344,028
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#254
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,501
of 237,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.