↓ Skip to main content

Aromatase inhibitors for metastatic male breast cancer: molecular, endocrine, and clinical considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Aromatase inhibitors for metastatic male breast cancer: molecular, endocrine, and clinical considerations
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10549-014-3087-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Maugeri-Saccà, Maddalena Barba, Patrizia Vici, Laura Pizzuti, Domenico Sergi, Ruggero De Maria, Luigi Di Lauro

Abstract

Male breast cancer is a rare condition. Aromatase inhibitors are widely used for treating metastatic male breast cancer patients. In this setting, their use is not substantiated by prospective clinical trials, but is rather driven by similarities supposedly existing with breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This oversimplified approach was questioned by studies addressing the molecular and endocrine roots of the disease. In this manuscript, we discuss relevant aspects of the current use of aromatase inhibitors in metastatic male breast cancer in light of the most updated evidence on the molecular landscape of the disease and the specific changes in the hormonal background occurring with aging. We further point to strategies for blocking multiple hormonal pathway nodes with the goal of improving their therapeutic potential. We searched PubMed from its inception until March 2014 for relevant literature on the use of aromatase inhibitors in metastatic male breast cancer. Selected terms were combined and used both as medical headings and text words. The reference list of the suitable manuscripts was inspected for further publications. Aromatase inhibitors represent the mainstay of treatment in the metastatic setting. Yet, efforts aimed at sharpening the therapeutic potential of aromatase inhibitors still pose a challenge due to the paucity of data. The choice of dual hormonal (or sequential) therapy combining aromatase inhibitors with a GnRH analogue may represent a valid alterative, particularly if informed by cancer- and patient-related features including molecular, endocrine, and clinic characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,666,929
of 24,074,860 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#2,928
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,119
of 235,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,074,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.