| Title |
Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Criminology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y |
| Authors |
Lois James, Bryan Vila, Kenn Daratha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 22% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 91% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#547,260
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#22
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,908
of 202,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them