↓ Skip to main content

p16CDKN2A SNP rs11515 was not associated with head and neck carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
p16CDKN2A SNP rs11515 was not associated with head and neck carcinoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-1809-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ugo Borges Pinheiro, Carlos Alberto de Carvalho Fraga, Danilo Cangussu Mendes, Luciano Marques-Silva, Lucyana Conceição Farias, Marcela Gonçalves de Souza, Mariana Batista Soares, Kimberly Marie Jones, Sérgio Henrique Souza Santos, Alfredo Maurício Batista de Paula, Gustavo Velásquez-Meléndez, André Luiz Guimarães

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is considered a serious public health problem in many countries. Recently, genetic variations have been considered as important factors to cancer susceptibility and prognosis. More specifically, genetic polymorphisms have been associated with the development and prognosis of HNSCC. The purpose of the current study was to investigate an association among p16 (CDKN2A) gene polymorphism at rs11515, age, and HNSCC aggressiveness. PCR-RFLP analysis was used to investigate the p16 (CDKN2A) gene in 96 patients with HNSCC and in 100 individuals without HNSCC. A case group was categorized by age in younger (<60 years) and older (≥ 60 years) patients. Differences between the case and control groups were determined using Fisher and chi-squared tests. Time of survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of last follow-up visit or to the date of death using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and comparing this to the log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. In the present study, no association was established between HNSCC and rs11515 polymorphism, as indicated in a previous study. We found that HNSCC individuals with large-sized tumors and with metastatic disease presented worse overall survival, consistent with fundamental concepts that establish the effects of tumor size and lymph node metastasis to HNSCC outcomes. This study identified that there is no difference in the distribution of rs11515 between the control and HNSCC groups. In addition, no differences between rs11515 genotypes and clinicopathological parameters were observed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,370
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,944
of 221,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#33
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.