↓ Skip to main content

Depression and Anxiety in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Depression and Anxiety in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Etiology and Treatment
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0834-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura G. Cooney, Anuja Dokras

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in reproductive age women and is associated with an increased prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms. This review presents potential mechanisms for this increased risk and outlines treatment options. Women with PCOS have increased odds of depressive symptoms (OR 3.78; 95% CI 3.03-4.72) and anxiety symptoms (OR 5.62; 95% CI 3.22-9.80). Obesity, insulin resistance, and elevated androgens may partly contribute to this association. Therefore, in addition to established treatment options, treatment of PCOS-related symptoms with lifestyle modification and/or oral contraceptive pills may be of benefit. Screening for anxiety and depression is recommended in women with PCOS at the time of diagnosis. The exact etiology for the increased risk in PCOS is still unclear. Moreover, there is a paucity of published data on the most effective behavioral, pharmacological, or physiological treatment options specifically in women with PCOS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 95 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 12 6%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 93 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,890,043
of 24,547,718 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#225
of 1,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,682
of 322,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,547,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.