| Title |
Making sense of climate engineering: a focus group study of lay publics in four countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-017-2067-0 |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-141207
|
| Authors |
Victoria Wibeck, Anders Hansson, Jonas Anshelm, Shinichiro Asayama, Lisa Dilling, Pamela M. Feetham, Rachel Hauser, Atsushi Ishii, Masahiro Sugiyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#493,914
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#254
of 5,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,992
of 321,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.