| Title |
Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viswanathan Shankar, Shrikant I Bangdiwala |
| Abstract |
Various measures of observer agreement have been proposed for 2 x 2 tables. We examine the behavior of alternative measures of observer agreement for 2 x 2 tables. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,412,462
of 25,088,711 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,924
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,859
of 242,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,088,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.