You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variants at APOE influence risk of deep and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.22134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Biffi, Akshata Sonni, Christopher D. Anderson, Brett Kissela, Jeremiasz M. Jagiella, Helena Schmidt, Jordi Jimenez‐Conde, Björn M. Hansen, Israel Fernandez‐Cadenas, Lynelle Cortellini, Alison Ayres, Kristin Schwab, Karol Juchniewicz, Andrzej Urbanik, Natalia S. Rost, Anand Viswanathan, Thomas Seifert‐Held, Eva‐Maria Stoegerer, Marta Tomás, Raquel Rabionet, Xavier Estivill, Devin L. Brown, Scott L. Silliman, Magdy Selim, Bradford B. Worrall, James F. Meschia, Joan Montaner, Arne Lindgren, Jaume Roquer, Reinhold Schmidt, Steven M. Greenberg, Agnieszka Slowik, Joseph P. Broderick, Daniel Woo, Jonathan Rosand, on behalf of the International Stroke Genetics Consortium |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 20% |
| Researcher | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,978,221
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#2,107
of 5,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,063
of 115,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.