| Title |
Adapting clonally propagated crops to climatic changes: a global approach for taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-017-0557-6 |
| Authors |
V. Lebot, V. Tuia, A. Ivancic, G. V. H. Jackson, F. Saborio, G. Reyes, S. Rodriguez, G. Robin, R. Traoré, L. Aboagye, J. Onyeka, W. van Rensburg, V. Andrianavalona, A. Mukherjee, M. S. Prana, D. Ferraren, B. Komolong, F. Lawac, S. Winter, M. A. A. Pinheiro de Carvalho, T. Iosefa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 38% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,338,878
of 25,049,929 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#82
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,421
of 321,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,049,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.