↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular risk and dietary sugar intake: is the link so sweet?

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Cardiovascular risk and dietary sugar intake: is the link so sweet?
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11739-011-0606-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Mucci, Francesca Santilli, Chiara Cuccurullo, Giovanni Davì

Abstract

Soft drinks and sugar-sweetened beverages have been targeted as one of the primary culprits in the escalating rates of obesity and diabetes and reduction of added sugars is considered between the goals to achieve in order to promote cardiovascular health and to reduce deaths from cardiovascular causes. Many reliable mechanisms, such as dislypidemia, inflammation and enhanced oxidative stress, have been proposed to support a causal link between sugar sweetened beverages intake and cardiovascular risk, but the ultimate underlying pathways remain to be determined in adequately designed studies. Furthermore, while epidemiological evidence strongly supports an association between sugar sweetened beverages consumption and obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular risk, incongruous findings yielded by clinical trials, or formal meta-analyses make difficult to draw firm conclusions in this regard. Further and rigorous studies are needed to better understand the role of sugar sweetened beverages in the etiology of cardiovascular diseases and to better address the warnings and decisions of regulatory authorities on public health worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#17,548,753
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#689
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,464
of 123,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.