↓ Skip to main content

Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case–control study in California

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case–control study in California
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10552-017-0951-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leeka Kheifets, Catherine M. Crespi, Chris Hooper, Myles Cockburn, Aryana T. Amoon, Ximena P. Vergara

Abstract

Studies have reported an increased risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to magnetic fields. We conducted a large records-based case-control study of childhood leukemia risk and exposure to magnetic fields from power lines in California. The study included 5,788 childhood leukemia cases (born in and diagnosed in California 1986-2008) matched to population-based controls on age and sex. We calculated magnetic fields at birth addresses using geographic information systems, aerial imagery, historical information on load and phasing, and site visits. Based on unconditional logistic regression controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status using subjects geocoded to a basic standard of accuracy, we report a slight risk deficit in two intermediate exposure groups and a small excess risk in the highest exposure group (odds ratio of 1.50 (95% confidence interval [0.70, 3.23])). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses as well as matched analyses gave similar results. All estimates had wide confidence intervals. Our large, statewide, record-based case-control study of childhood leukemia in California does not in itself provide clear evidence of risk associated with greater exposure to magnetic fields from power lines, but could be viewed as consistent with previous findings of increased risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 8 42%