↓ Skip to main content

Sequencing of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease genes in a toxic polyneuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sequencing of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease genes in a toxic polyneuropathy
Published in
Annals of Neurology, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/ana.24265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas S. Beutler, Amit A. Kulkarni, Rahul Kanwar, Christopher J. Klein, Terry M. Therneau, Rui Qin, Michaela S. Banck, Ganesh K. Boora, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Yanhong Wu, Regenia L. Smalley, Julie M. Cunningham, Nguyet Anh Le‐Lindqwister, Peter Beyerlein, Gary P. Schroth, Anthony J. Windebank, Stephan Züchner, Charles L. Loprinzi

Abstract

Objective: Mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) genes are the cause of rare familial forms of polyneuropathy. Whether allelic variability in CMT genes is also associated with common forms of polyneuropathy-considered "acquired" in medical parlance-is unknown. Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs commonly in cancer patients and is individually unpredictable. We used CIPN as clinical model to investigate the association of non-CMT polyneuropathy with CMT genes. Methods: 269 neurologically asymptomatic cancer patients were enrolled in the clinical trial Alliance N08C1 to receive the neurotoxic drug paclitaxel, while undergoing prospective assessments for polyneuropathy. 49 CMT genes were analyzed by targeted massively parallel sequencing of genomic DNA from patient blood. Results: 119 (of 269) patients were identified from the two ends of the polyneuropathy phenotype distribution: patients that were most- and least susceptible to paclitaxel polyneuropathy. The CMT gene PRX was found to be deleteriously mutated in patients who were susceptible to CIPN but not in controls (p=8x10(-3) ). Genetic variation in another CMT gene, ARHGEF10, was highly significantly associated with CIPN (p=5x10(-4) ). Three non-synonymous recurrent single nucleotide variants contributed to the ARHGEF10 signal: rs9657362, rs2294039, and rs17683288. Of these, rs9657362 had the strongest effect (odds ratio of 4.8, p=4x10(-4) ). Interpretation: The results reveal an association of CMT gene allelic variability with susceptibility to CIPN. The findings raise the possibility that other acquired polyneuropathies may also be co-determined by genetic etiological factors, of which some may be related to genes already known to cause the phenotypically related Mendelian disorders of CMT. ANN NEUROL 2014. © 2014 American Neurological Association.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#22,029,081
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#5,375
of 5,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,597
of 254,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#41
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.