↓ Skip to main content

The national trust for talent? NESTA and New Labour’s cultural policy

Overview of attention for article published in British Politics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The national trust for talent? NESTA and New Labour’s cultural policy
Published in
British Politics, January 2014
DOI 10.1057/bp.2013.34
Authors

Kate Oakley, David Hesmondhalgh, David Lee, Melissa Nisbett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 14%
Lecturer 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,304,580
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from British Politics
#238
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,916
of 307,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Politics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them