| Title |
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in irradiated patients: a meta-analysis on implant survival
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-013-1134-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Schiegnitz, B. Al-Nawas, P. W. Kämmerer, K. A. Grötz |
| Abstract |
The aim of this comprehensive literature review is to provide recommendations and guidelines for dental implant therapy in patients with a history of radiation in the head and neck region. For the first time, a meta-analysis comparing the implant survival in irradiated and non-irradiated patients was performed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 29% |
| Unknown | 39 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 57% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,941,665
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#278
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,938
of 302,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.