| Title |
Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r70 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas A Hosack, Glynn Dennis, Brad T Sherman, H Clifford Lane, Richard A Lempicki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 461 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 142 | 27% |
| Researcher | 142 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 263 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,025,631
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,270
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,483
of 54,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.