| Title |
Clinical Utility of Celiac Disease-Associated HLA Testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10620-014-3143-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kumar Pallav, Toufic Kabbani, Sohaib Tariq, Rohini Vanga, Ciaran P. Kelly, Daniel A. Leffler |
| Abstract |
Negative predictive value (NPV) of celiac disease (CD)-related human leukocyte antigens (HLA) DQ2 and DQ8 approaches 100 % in individual patients. However, studies evaluating its exclusionary utility in patient groups are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,796,765
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1,134
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,866
of 229,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.