| Title |
Reversion of advanced Ebola virus disease in nonhuman primates with ZMapp
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13777 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiangguo Qiu, Gary Wong, Jonathan Audet, Alexander Bello, Lisa Fernando, Judie B. Alimonti, Hugues Fausther-Bovendo, Haiyan Wei, Jenna Aviles, Ernie Hiatt, Ashley Johnson, Josh Morton, Kelsi Swope, Ognian Bohorov, Natasha Bohorova, Charles Goodman, Do Kim, Michael H. Pauly, Jesus Velasco, James Pettitt, Gene G. Olinger, Kevin Whaley, Bianli Xu, James E. Strong, Larry Zeitlin, Gary P. Kobinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 7% |
| Spain | 17 | 6% |
| Japan | 15 | 5% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 137 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 208 | 75% |
| Scientists | 37 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,002 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 957 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 226 | 23% |
| Researcher | 165 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 152 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 122 | 12% |
| Other | 62 | 6% |
| Other | 149 | 15% |
| Unknown | 126 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 293 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 160 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 157 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 75 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 131 | 13% |
| Unknown | 149 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#11,955
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,197
of 98,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59
of 248,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#12
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.