↓ Skip to main content

Authorship attribution in the wild

Overview of attention for article published in Language Resources and Evaluation, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Authorship attribution in the wild
Published in
Language Resources and Evaluation, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10579-009-9111-2
Authors

Moshe Koppel, Jonathan Schler, Shlomo Argamon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Australia 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 134 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 73 50%
Linguistics 25 17%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#6,234,085
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Language Resources and Evaluation
#58
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,113
of 169,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Language Resources and Evaluation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.