| Title |
Biodiversity and ecosystem services: lessons from nature to improve management of planted forests for REDD-plus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0736-0 |
| Authors |
Ian D. Thompson, Kimiko Okabe, John A. Parrotta, Eckehard Brockerhoff, Hervé Jactel, David I. Forrester, Hisatomo Taki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 87 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,133
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,757
of 244,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.