Title |
Group hunting in a ponerine ant, Leptogenys nitida Smith
|
---|---|
Published in |
Oecologia, February 1994
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00317915 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frances D. Duncan, Robin M. Crewe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 58% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,456,049
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#412
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,902
of 70,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.