↓ Skip to main content

Regional and seasonal variations of the double-ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Regional and seasonal variations of the double-ITCZ bias in CMIP5 models
Published in
Climate Dynamics, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3909-1
Authors

Ori Adam, Tapio Schneider, Florent Brient

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 57%
Environmental Science 9 13%
Engineering 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,562,805
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#1,714
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,849
of 289,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#47
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.