↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of dermatoscopy for the diagnosis of nonpigmented cancers of the skin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of dermatoscopy for the diagnosis of nonpigmented cancers of the skin
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Sinz, Philipp Tschandl, Cliff Rosendahl, Bengu Nisa Akay, Giuseppe Argenziano, Andreas Blum, Ralph P. Braun, Horacio Cabo, Jean-Yves Gourhant, Juergen Kreusch, Aimilios Lallas, Jan Lapins, Ashfaq A. Marghoob, Scott W. Menzies, John Paoli, Harold S. Rabinovitz, Christoph Rinner, Alon Scope, H. Peter Soyer, Luc Thomas, Iris Zalaudek, Harald Kittler

Abstract

Nonpigmented skin cancer is common, and diagnosis with the unaided eye is error prone. To investigate whether dermatoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy for nonpigmented (amelanotic) cutaneous neoplasms. We collected a sample of 2072 benign and malignant neoplastic lesions and inflammatory conditions and presented close-up images taken with and without dermatoscopy to 95 examiners with different levels of experience. The area under the curve was significantly higher with than without dermatoscopy (0.68 vs 0.64, P < .001). Among 51 possible diagnoses, the correct diagnosis was selected in 33.1% of cases with and 26.4% of cases without dermatoscopy (P < .001). For experts, the frequencies of correct specific diagnoses of a malignant lesion improved from 40.2% without to 51.3% with dermatoscopy. For all malignant neoplasms combined, the frequencies of appropriate management strategies increased from 78.1% without to 82.5% with dermatoscopy. The study deviated from a real-life clinical setting and was potentially affected by verification and selection bias. Dermatoscopy improves the diagnosis and management of nonpigmented skin cancer and should be used as an adjunct to examination with the unaided eye.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Other 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Computer Science 9 9%
Engineering 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,649,275
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#892
of 10,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,840
of 325,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#32
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.