↓ Skip to main content

Exploring Barriers to Payer Utilization of Genetic Counselors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Exploring Barriers to Payer Utilization of Genetic Counselors
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10897-014-9745-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nan Doyle, Allison Cirino, Amber Trivedi, Maureen Flynn

Abstract

Access to genetic counselors' services is neither universal nor automatic, due in part to the gatekeeper role of healthcare payers - the companies and agencies that purchase healthcare services on patients' behalf and control the bulk of healthcare spending. This pilot study surveyed and analyzed the relative importance of barriers to expanded payer coverage of genetic counselors' services. Surveys were mailed to 263 medical directors and quality assurance directors at health insurance carriers throughout the United States. Respondents provided demographic information and indicated the importance of nine possible barriers, plus an optional write-in "other." Twenty-two surveys were analyzed. "Evidence that use of genetic counselors improves health outcomes" led the list of factors having a significant/very significant influence on coverage policy. Sixteen respondents (73 %) rated this factor "4" or "5" on a Likert scale; it also received the most #1 rankings and the highest score using a weighted-mean analysis. Provider practice guidelines, CMS/Medicare regulations, and genetic counselor licensure-all of which are outside of payers' direct control-also ranked highly. The research demonstrates that although the potential barriers to expanded reimbursement for genetic counselors are numerous and complex, some are more consistently identified as important and therefore more deserving of legislative and advocacy resources to effect change. Future research should endeavor to increase survey response and include providers as well as payers. (222 words).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 24%
Other 4 14%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,652,526
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#192
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,478
of 235,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.