↓ Skip to main content

Does urbanization facilitate individual recognition of humans by house sparrows?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Does urbanization facilitate individual recognition of humans by house sparrows?
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10071-014-0799-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernő Vincze, Sándor Papp, Bálint Preiszner, Gábor Seress, András Liker, Veronika Bókony

Abstract

Wild animals living in proximity to humans may benefit from recognizing people individually and adjusting their behaviour to the potential risk or gain expected from each person. Although several urban-dwelling species exhibit such skills, it is unclear whether this is due to pre-existing advanced cognitive abilities of taxa predisposed for city life or arises specifically in urban populations either by selection or through ontogenetic changes facilitated by exposure to humans. To test these alternatives, we studied populations of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) along the urbanization gradient. We manipulated the birds' experience (hostile or not) associated with humans with different faces (masks) and measured their behavioural responses to the proximity of each person. Contrary to our expectations, we found that while rural birds showed less fear of the non-hostile than of the hostile or an unfamiliar person, urban birds made no distinction. These results indicate that house sparrows are less able to recognize individual humans or less willing to behaviourally respond to them in more urbanized habitats with high human population density. We propose several mechanisms that may explain this difference, including reduced pay-off of discrimination due to a low chance of repeated interactions with city people, or a higher likelihood that city people will ignore them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 21%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 46%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Psychology 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,453,639
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#858
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,639
of 238,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.