↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that neuronal Notch-1 promotes JNK/c-Jun activation and cell death following ischemic stress

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Research Protocols, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence that neuronal Notch-1 promotes JNK/c-Jun activation and cell death following ischemic stress
Published in
Brain Research Protocols, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Lin Cheng, Yuri Choi, Wei Lun Seow, Silvia Manzanero, Christopher G. Sobey, Dong-Gyu Jo, Thiruma V. Arumugam

Abstract

Notch signaling is a highly conserved pathway that regulates cell fate decisions during embryonic development. We have recently identified that in ischemic stroke, activity of γ-secretase and the resulting Notch activation may endanger neurons by modulating NF-κB and HIF-1α pathways. Notch signaling can also modulate MAPK-related pathways. However, the role of γ-secretase-mediated Notch signaling in activating MAPK following ischemic stroke has not been investigated. We used control and NICD1-overexpressing HEK and SH-SY5Y cell lines, and inhibitors of secretase and JNK, to explore novel roles of Notch in modulating cell death following ischemic stress in vitro. Our findings indicate that expression of NICD1, JNK/cJun, p38-MAPK and the pro-apoptotic marker, cleaved caspase-3, increased during ischemic conditions. γ-secretase inhibitors reduced ischemia-induced increases in NICD1 and JNK/p-cJun. Furthermore, NICD overexpression augmented JNK/cJun levels and cell death under these conditions. These results suggest that Notch signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke, in part by promoting JNK/cJun signaling. These results provide further support for the potential use of γ-secretase inhibitors as therapy for ischemic stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brain Research Protocols
#9,372
of 10,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,782
of 247,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Research Protocols
#62
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.