Title |
Effects of alveolar recruitment maneuvers on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3413-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erica Aranha Suzumura, Mabel Figueiró, Karina Normilio-Silva, Lígia Laranjeira, Claudia Oliveira, Anna Maria Buehler, Diogo Bugano, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho, Otavio Berwanger, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti |
Abstract |
To assess the effects of alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 156 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 14% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Other | 39 | 24% |
Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 65% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,595,787
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,291
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,365
of 230,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.