↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Gun-Hunting on Diurnal Primates in Continental Equatorial Guinea

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Impact of Gun-Hunting on Diurnal Primates in Continental Equatorial Guinea
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10764-008-9254-9
Authors

Noëlle F. Kümpel, E. J. Milner-Gulland, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Guy Cowlishaw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 163 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Master 35 21%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 42%
Environmental Science 48 28%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 21 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,540,093
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,747
of 82,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.