↓ Skip to main content

Development of finger force coordination in children

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Development of finger force coordination in children
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00221-017-5093-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Shaklai, Aviva Mimouni-Bloch, Moran Levin, Jason Friedman

Abstract

Coordination is often observed as body parts moving together. However, when producing force with multiple fingers, the optimal coordination is not to produce similar forces with each finger, but rather for each finger to correct mistakes of other fingers. In this study, we aim to determine whether and how this skill develops in children aged 4-12 years. We measured this sort of coordination using the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis (UCM). We recorded finger forces produced by 60 typically developing children aged between 4 and 12 years in a finger-pressing task. The children controlled the height of an object on a screen by the total amount of force they produced on force sensors. We found that the synergy index, a measure of the relationship between "good" and "bad" variance, increased linearly as a function of age. This improvement was achieved by a selective reduction in "bad" variance rather than an increase in "good" variance. We did not observe differences between males and females, and the synergy index was not able to predict outcomes of upper limb behavioral tests after controlling for age. As children develop between the ages of 4 and 12 years, their ability to produce negative covariation between their finger forces improves, likely related to their improved ability to perform dexterous tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 18%
Psychology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,807,147
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#742
of 3,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,543
of 318,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.