↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of mortality in a pooled cohort of Canadian and German uranium processing workers with no mining experience

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of mortality in a pooled cohort of Canadian and German uranium processing workers with no mining experience
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00420-017-1260-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lydia B. Zablotska, Nora Fenske, Maria Schnelzer, Sergey Zhivin, Dominique Laurier, Michaela Kreuzer

Abstract

Long-term health risks of occupational exposures to uranium processing were examined to better understand potential differences with uranium underground miners and nuclear reactor workers. A cohort study of mortality of workers from Port Hope, Canada (1950-1999) and Wismut, Germany (1946-2008) employed in uranium milling, refining, and processing was conducted. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between cumulative exposures to radon decay products (RDP) and gamma-rays and causes of death potentially related to uranium processing. The pooled cohort included 7431 workers (270,201 person-years of follow-up). Mean RDP exposures were lower than in miners while gamma-ray doses were higher than in reactor workers. Both exposures were highly correlated (weighted rho = 0.81). Radiation risks of lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in males were increased but not statistically significant and compatible with risks estimated for miners and reactor workers, respectively. Higher RDP-associated CVD risks were observed for exposures 5-14 years prior to diagnosis compared to later exposures and among those employed <5 years. Radiation risks of solid cancers excluding lung cancer were increased, but not statistically significant, both for males and females, while all other causes of death were not associated with exposures. In the largest study of uranium processing workers to systematically examine radiation risks of multiple outcomes from RDP exposures and gamma-rays, estimated radiation risks were compatible with risks reported for uranium miners and nuclear reactor workers. Continued follow-up and pooling with other cohorts of uranium processing workers are necessary for future comparisons with other workers of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Engineering 5 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#1,721
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,217
of 319,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.