↓ Skip to main content

Hepatocellular carcinoma biology predicts survival outcome after liver transplantation in the USA

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Hepatocellular carcinoma biology predicts survival outcome after liver transplantation in the USA
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12664-017-0732-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed Abd El-Fattah

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathologic prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) stratified by tumor size. From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries (2004-2012), we retrieved data of 570 patients who underwent LT for a solitary primary HCC lesion ≤5 cm. A two multivariable Cox models were constructed to identify prognostic factors of CSS in a two different tumor sizes (2 cm cutoff). Out of 570 HCC patients (median age 57 years), 16% had microvascular invasion (MVI) and 12% had a poorly differentiated tumor. Male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.6), tumor size >2 cm (OR 1.78), elevated AFP (OR 2.31), and poor tumor differentiation (OR 2.59) are significant predictors of MVI. With a median follow up of 41.5 months (range 1-107 months), the 5-year CSS rate was 90% in the absence of MVI compared to 75% in the presence of MVI (p<0.001). Multivariate models revealed that age ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08), MVI (HR 2.26), and poor tumor differentiation (HR 2.42), were significant risk factors of a dismal CSS with HCC size >2 cm, but not with HCC ≤2 cm. Primary HCC tumor size ≤2 cm had an excellent prognosis after LT and was not affect by the presence of MVI or poor tumor differentiation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Librarian 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,447,499
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
#280
of 357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,001
of 428,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 357 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.