↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Plant Taxonomy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Molecular Plant Taxonomy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Plant Taxonomy: A Historical Perspective, Current Challenges, and Perspectives
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Guidelines for the choice of sequences for molecular plant taxonomy.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Leaf Tissue Sampling and DNA Extraction Protocols
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 DNA Extraction from Herbarium Specimens
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Analysis of variation in chloroplast DNA sequences.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Mitochondrial Genome and Plant Taxonomy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Nuclear Ribosomal RNA Genes: ITS Region
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 New Technologies for Ultrahigh-Throughput Genotyping in Plant Taxonomy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Development of Microsatellite-Enriched Libraries
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and Derived Techniques
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Multilocus Profiling with AFLP, ISSR, and SAMPL
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Transposon-Based Tagging: IRAP, REMAP, and iPBS
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Phylogenetic reconstruction methods: an overview.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The Application of Flow Cytometry for Estimating Genome Size and Ploidy Level in Plants
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Molecular Cytogenetics (FISH and Fluorochrome Banding): Resolving Species Relationships and Genome Organization.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 GISH: Resolving Interspecific and Intergeneric Hybrids.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 On the relevance of molecular tools for taxonomic revision in malvales, malvaceae s.L., and dombeyoideae.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 What has molecular systematics contributed to our knowledge of the plant family proteaceae?
Attention for Chapter 18: What has molecular systematics contributed to our knowledge of the plant family proteaceae?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
What has molecular systematics contributed to our knowledge of the plant family proteaceae?
Chapter number 18
Book title
Molecular Plant Taxonomy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-766-2, 978-1-62703-767-9
Authors

Weston PH, Peter H. Weston, Weston, Peter H.

Abstract

Molecular systematics has revolutionized our understanding of the evolution of the Proteaceae. Phylogenetic relationships have been reconstructed down to generic level and below from alignments of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. These trees have enabled the monophyly of all subfamilies, tribes, and subtribes to be rigorously tested and the construction of a new classification of the family at these ranks. Molecular data have also played a major part in testing the monophyly of genera and infrageneric taxa, some of which have been recircumscribed as a result. Molecular trees and chronograms have been used to test numerous previously postulated biogeographic and evolutionary hypotheses, some of which have been modified or abandoned as a result. Hypotheses that have been supported by molecular phylogenetic trees and chronograms include the following: that the proteaceous pattern of repeated disjunct distributions across the southern hemisphere is partly the result of long-distance dispersal; that high proteaceous diversity in south-western Australia and the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa is due to high diversification rates in some clades but is not an evolutionary response to Mediterranean climates; that the sclerophyllous leaves of many shrubby members of the family are not adaptations to dry environments but for protecting mesophyll in brightly illuminated habitats; that deeply encrypted foliar stomata are adaptations for minimizing water loss in dry environments; and that Protea originated in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa and that one of its subclades has greatly expanded its distribution into tropical savannas. Reconstructing phylogeny down to species level is now the main goal of molecular systematists of the Proteaceae. The biggest challenge in achieving this task will be resolving species trees from numerous gene trees in complexes of closely related species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,870
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,817
of 304,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#299
of 610 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 610 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.