| Title |
Safety and effectiveness using dexmedetomidine versus propofol TCI sedation during oesophagus interventions: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-230x-13-176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne Eberl, Benedikt Preckel, Jacques J Bergman, Markus W Hollmann |
| Abstract |
Endoscopic treatment of early neoplastic lesions in oesophagus has evolved as a valid and less invasive alternative to surgical resection. These endoscopic interventions are minimal invasive treatment options usually done with sedation on an outpatient basis. The aim of this trial is to determine the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine sedation compared to the standard used propofol TCI sedation during endoscopic oesophageal interventions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 52% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |