You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rationale and Design of the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgu005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay M Morton, Joshua N Sampson, James R Cerhan, Jennifer J Turner, Claire M Vajdic, Sophia S Wang, Karin E Smedby, Silvia de Sanjosé, Alain Monnereau, Yolanda Benavente, Paige M Bracci, Brian C H Chiu, Christine F Skibola, Yawei Zhang, Sam M Mbulaiteye, Michael Spriggs, Dennis Robinson, Aaron D Norman, Eleanor V Kane, John J Spinelli, Jennifer L Kelly, Carlo La Vecchia, Luigino Dal Maso, Marc Maynadié, Marshall E Kadin, Pierluigi Cocco, Adele Seniori Costantini, Christina A Clarke, Eve Roman, Lucia Miligi, Joanne S Colt, Sonja I Berndt, Andrea Mannetje, Anneclaire J de Roos, Anne Kricker, Alexandra Nieters, Silvia Franceschi, Mads Melbye, Paolo Boffetta, Jacqueline Clavel, Martha S Linet, Dennis D Weisenburger, Susan L Slager |
| Abstract |
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), the most common hematologic malignancy, consists of numerous subtypes. The etiology of NHL is incompletely understood, and increasing evidence suggests that risk factors may vary by NHL subtype. However, small numbers of cases have made investigation of subtype-specific risks challenging. The International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium therefore undertook the NHL Subtypes Project, an international collaborative effort to investigate the etiologies of NHL subtypes. This article describes in detail the project rationale and design. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,025,929
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
#68
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,309
of 247,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.