↓ Skip to main content

Anticipative management for coral reef ecosystem services in the 21st century

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticipative management for coral reef ecosystem services in the 21st century
Published in
Global Change Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/gcb.12725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Rogers, Alastair R. Harborne, Christopher J. Brown, Yves‐Marie Bozec, Carolina Castro, Iliana Chollett, Karlo Hock, Cheryl A. Knowland, Alyssa Marshell, Juan C. Ortiz, Tries Razak, George Roff, Jimena Samper‐Villarreal, Megan I. Saunders, Nicholas H. Wolff, Peter J. Mumby

Abstract

Under projections of global climate change and other stressors, significant changes in the ecology, structure and function of coral reefs are predicted. Current management strategies tend to look to the past to set goals, focusing on halting declines and restoring baseline conditions. Here, we explore a complementary approach to decision making that is based on the anticipation of future changes in ecosystem state, function and services. Reviewing the existing literature and utilizing a scenario planning approach, we explore how the structure of coral reef communities might change in the future in response to global climate change and overfishing. We incorporate uncertainties in our predictions by considering heterogeneity in reef types in relation to structural complexity and primary productivity. We examine 14 ecosystem services provided by reefs, and rate their sensitivity to a range of future scenarios and management options. Our predictions suggest that the efficacy of management is highly dependent on biophysical characteristics and reef state. Reserves are currently widely used and are predicted to remain effective for reefs with high structural complexity. However, when complexity is lost, maximizing service provision requires a broader portfolio of management approaches, including the provision of artificial complexity, coral restoration, fish aggregation devices and herbivore management. Increased use of such management tools will require capacity building and technique refinement and we therefore conclude that diversification of our management toolbox should be considered urgently to prepare for the challenges of managing reefs into the 21st century.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 432 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 102 23%
Student > Master 84 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Other 16 4%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 77 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 34%
Environmental Science 147 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 89 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,321,678
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,623
of 6,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,947
of 260,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#19
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.