↓ Skip to main content

Emergency Department Visits for Homelessness or Inadequate Housing in New York City before and after Hurricane Sandy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Emergency Department Visits for Homelessness or Inadequate Housing in New York City before and after Hurricane Sandy
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11524-016-0035-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly M. Doran, Ryan P. McCormack, Eileen L. Johns, Brendan G. Carr, Silas W. Smith, Lewis R. Goldfrank, David C. Lee

Abstract

Hurricane Sandy struck New York City on October 29, 2012, causing not only a large amount of physical damage, but also straining people's health and disrupting health care services throughout the city. In prior research, we determined that emergency department (ED) visits from the most vulnerable hurricane evacuation flood zones in New York City increased after Hurricane Sandy for several medical diagnoses, but also for the diagnosis of homelessness. In the current study, we aimed to further explore this increase in ED visits for homelessness after Hurricane Sandy's landfall. We performed an observational before-and-after study using an all-payer claims database of ED visits in New York City to compare the demographic characteristics, insurance status, geographic distribution, and health conditions of ED patients with a primary or secondary ICD-9 diagnosis of homelessness or inadequate housing in the first week after Hurricane Sandy's landfall versus the baseline weekly average in 2012 prior to Hurricane Sandy. We found statistically significant increases in ED visits for diagnosis codes of homelessness or inadequate housing in the week after Hurricane Sandy's landfall. Those accessing the ED for homelessness or inadequate housing were more often elderly and insured by Medicare after versus before the hurricane. Secondary diagnoses among those with a primary ED diagnosis of homelessness or inadequate housing also differed after versus before Hurricane Sandy. These observed differences in the demographic, insurance, and co-existing diagnosis profiles of those with an ED diagnosis of homelessness or inadequate housing before and after Hurricane Sandy suggest that a new population cohort-potentially including those who had lost their homes as a result of storm damage-was accessing the ED for homelessness or other housing issues after the hurricane. Emergency departments may serve important public health and disaster response roles after a hurricane, particularly for people who are homeless or lack adequate housing. Further, tracking ED visits for homelessness may represent a novel surveillance mechanism to assess post-disaster infrastructure impact and to prepare for future disasters.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Grenada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 29 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,540,398
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#738
of 1,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,303
of 299,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.