You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antibiotic prescribing for the future: exploring the attitudes of trainees in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681373 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthea Dallas, Mieke van Driel, Thea van de Mortel, Parker Magin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,871,137
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,467
of 4,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,007
of 238,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#40
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.