You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Care plans and care planning in the management of long-term conditions in the UK: a controlled prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681385 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Reeves, Mark Hann, Jo Rick, Kelly Rowe, Nicola Small, Jenni Burt, Martin Roland, Joanne Protheroe, Tom Blakeman, Gerry Richardson, Anne Kennedy, Peter Bower |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 44% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#753,965
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#321
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,250
of 244,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.