↓ Skip to main content

Sibling Involvement in Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Sibling Involvement in Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2222-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn M. Shivers, Joshua B. Plavnick

Abstract

Many researchers have studied various interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Occasionally, siblings will be included in intervention studies, participating in programs designed to address a number of challenges faced by individuals with ASD. Although sibling involvement in such interventions is not a new phenomenon, there is no consistent method for including siblings in treatment for individuals with ASD. The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature describing sibling involvement in interventions among families of children with ASD, describing patterns of research and targeted outcomes. The authors also identify gaps and areas for future consideration from researchers, clinicians, and families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 37%
Social Sciences 24 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,237,186
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,904
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,073
of 249,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#53
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.