↓ Skip to main content

Epidural anesthesia for caesarean section in a pregnant patient with pituitary macroadenoma.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidural anesthesia for caesarean section in a pregnant patient with pituitary macroadenoma.
Published in
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, January 2014
DOI 10.7860/jcdr/2014/9666.4552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Remadevi R, D Dinesh Babu, K Sureshkumar, Shubhada A Patil

Abstract

Anaesthesia for patient with pituitary adenoma posted for non-neurosurgical surgeries is a challenge to the anaesthesiologist with the risk of sudden change in intracranial dynamics during administration of spinal anaesthesia or during stress response of general anaesthesia. There is a chance of increase in tumour size during antenatal period. A careful assessment of pituitary function and a screening of visual field and fundus examination are essential to rule out any mass effect. We are presenting the anaesthetic management of patient with pituitary macroadenoma posted for elective caesarean section done under epidural anaesthesia due to its rarity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
#956
of 1,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,818
of 319,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
#169
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.