| Title |
Evaluation of operation swordfish: a near-repeat target-hardening strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Criminology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11292-017-9301-7 |
| Authors |
Shane D. Johnson, Toby Davies, Alex Murray, Paul Ditta, Jyoti Belur, Kate Bowers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 31% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 34% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,312,381
of 25,310,061 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#63
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,943
of 325,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,310,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.