↓ Skip to main content

Glucose variability, HbA1c and microvascular complications

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Glucose variability, HbA1c and microvascular complications
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11154-016-9347-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Škrha, Jan Šoupal, Jan Škrha, Martin Prázný

Abstract

Microvascular complications in diabetes are associated with poor long-term diabetes control as measured by HbA1c levels. Glucose fluctuations are related to oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation, factors traditionally associated with the pathogenesis of vascular damage. Glucose variability has been associated with macrovascular disease in some studies but any association with microvascular disease remains controversial. This overview summarizes recent findings in the field of glucose variability and its possible relationship with retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. It is concluded that randomized prospective follow-up trials could possibly help estimate whether short-term glucose variability should be considered as an independent risk factor for microvascular complications in diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 31 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,218,560
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#313
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,054
of 302,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.