↓ Skip to main content

The First Magnetic Fields

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
207 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
The First Magnetic Fields
Published in
Space Science Reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9833-5
Authors

Lawrence M. Widrow, Dongsu Ryu, Dominik R. G. Schleicher, Kandaswamy Subramanian, Christos G. Tsagas, Rudolf A. Treumann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 35%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 45 73%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,304,580
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#874
of 1,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,311
of 135,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.