↓ Skip to main content

The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Knape, Herbert Mayer, Wilfried Schnepp, Friederike zu Sayn-Wittgenstein

Abstract

The continuous rise in caesarean rates across most European countries raises multiple concerns. One factor in this development might be the type of care women receive during childbirth. 'Supportive care during labour' by midwives could be an important factor for reducing fear, tension and pain and decreasing caesarean rates. The presence and availability of midwives to support a woman in line with her needs are central aspects for 'supportive care during labour'.To date, there is no existing research on the influence of effective 'supportive care' by German midwives on the mode of birth. This study examines the association between the attendance and workload of midwives with the mode of birth outcomes in a population of low-risk women in a German multicentre sample.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 44 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 22%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,785,791
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,334
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,756
of 239,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#30
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.