You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strength of stick-slip and creeping subduction megathrusts from heat flow observations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.1255487 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiang Gao, Kelin Wang |
Abstract |
Subduction faults, called megathrusts, can generate large and hazardous earthquakes. The mode of slip and seismicity of a megathrust is controlled by the structural complexity of the fault zone. However, the relative strength of a megathrust based on the mode of slip is far from clear. The fault strength affects surface heat flow by frictional heating during slip. We model heat-flow data for a number of subduction zones to determine the fault strength. We find that smooth megathrusts that produce great earthquakes tend to be weaker and therefore dissipate less heat than geometrically rough megathrusts that slip mainly by creeping. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
Nepal | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 215 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 24% |
Researcher | 40 | 18% |
Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 14% |
Unknown | 35 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 136 | 61% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 52 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,507,497
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Science
#38,631
of 77,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,857
of 236,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#475
of 915 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 915 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.