↓ Skip to main content

Metal release profiles of orthodontic bands, brackets, and wires: an in vitro study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Metal release profiles of orthodontic bands, brackets, and wires: an in vitro study
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00056-017-0107-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Wendl, H. Wiltsche, E. Lankmayr, H. Winsauer, A. Walter, A. Muchitsch, N. Jakse, M. Wendl, T. Wendl

Abstract

The present study evaluated the temporal release of Co Cr, Mn, and Ni from the components of a typical orthodontic appliance during simulated orthodontic treatment. Several commercially available types of bands, brackets, and wires were exposed to an artificial saliva solution for at least 44 days and the metals released were quantified in regular intervals using inductively coupled plasma quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Elan DRC+, Perkin Elmer, USA). Corrosion products encountered on some products were investigated by a scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray microanalyzer (EDX). Bands released the largest quantities of Co, Cr, Mn, and Ni, followed by brackets and wires. Three different temporal metal release profiles were observed: (1) constant, though not necessarily linear release, (2) saturation (metal release stopped after a certain time), and (3) an intermediate release profile that showed signs of saturation without reaching saturation. These temporal metal liberation profiles were found to be strongly dependent on the individual test pieces. The corrosion products which developed on some of the bands after a 6-month immersion in artificial saliva and the different metal release profiles of the investigated bands were traced back to different attachments welded onto the bands. The use of constant release rates will clearly underestimate metal intake by the patient during the first couple of days and overestimate exposure during the remainder of the treatment which is usually several months long. While our data are consistent with heavy metal release by orthodontic materials at levels well below typical dietary intake, we nevertheless recommend the use of titanium brackets and replacement of the band with a tube in cases of severe Ni or Cr allergy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
#118
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,795
of 319,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them