↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
Title
Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-4-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian J Barton, Pazit Levinger, Kay M Crossley, Kate E Webster, Hylton B Menz

Abstract

Foot posture assessment is commonly undertaken in clinical practice for the evaluation of individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), particularly when considering prescription of foot orthoses. However, the validity of static assessment to provide insight into dynamic function in individuals with PFPS is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the extent to which a static foot posture measurement tool (the Foot Posture Index - FPI) can provide insight into kinematic variables associated with foot pronation during level walking in individuals with PFPS and asymptomatic controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Student > Bachelor 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 31%
Sports and Recreations 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Engineering 13 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 59 22%