↓ Skip to main content

Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (or unknown) Advanced Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
64 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Women With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (or unknown) Advanced Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.1200/jco.2014.56.7479
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann H Partridge, R Bryan Rumble, Lisa A Carey, Steven E Come, Nancy E Davidson, Angelo Di Leo, Julie Gralow, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Beverly Moy, Douglas Yee, Shelley B Brundage, Michael A Danso, Maggie Wilcox, Ian E Smith

Abstract

To identify optimal chemo- and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)- negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer. A systematic review of randomized evidence (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses) from 1993 through to current was completed. Outcomes of interest included survival, progression-free survival, response, quality of life, and adverse effects. Guideline recommendations were evidence based and were agreed on by the Expert Panel via consensus. Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 20 systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, 30 trials on first-line treatment, and 29 trials on second-line and subsequent treatment. These trials form the evidence base for the guideline recommendations. Endocrine therapy is preferable to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer unless improvement is medically necessary (eg, immediately life-threatening disease). Single agent is preferable to combination chemotherapy, and longer planned duration improves outcome but must be balanced against toxicity. There is no single optimal first-line or subsequent line chemotherapy, and choice of treatment will be determined by multiple factors including prior therapy, toxicity, performance status, comorbid conditions, and patient preference. The role of bevacizumab remains controversial. Other targeted therapies have not so far been shown to enhance chemotherapy outcome in HER2-negative breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 254 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 17%
Other 42 16%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Other 62 23%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 56 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#664,696
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,490
of 22,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,391
of 248,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#17
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.