↓ Skip to main content

Common infection control practices in the emergency department: A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Infection Control, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common infection control practices in the emergency department: A literature review
Published in
American Journal of Infection Control, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen J. Carter, Stephanie M. Pouch, Elaine L. Larson

Abstract

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a major health concern, despite being largely avoidable. The emergency department (ED) is an essential component of the health care system and subject to workflow challenges, which may hinder ED personnel adherence to guideline-based infection prevention practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Gambia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 24%
Engineering 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#714,539
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Infection Control
#243
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,894
of 247,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Infection Control
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.