You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The strengths based approach as a service delivery model for severe mental illness: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12888-014-0243-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nashwa Ibrahim, Maria Michail, Patrick Callaghan |
Abstract |
The strengths-based approach is considered a paradigm shift from the deficits- focused service delivery models. The aim of this review was to systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi experimental studies examining the impact of the strengths-based approach on level of functioning and quality of life as primary outcomes and psychotic symptoms as secondary outcomes in people diagnosed with severe mental illness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 23% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,882,534
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,308
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,981
of 236,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#25
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.