↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle income countries

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge
157

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
46 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
702 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1024 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle income countries
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70168-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen B Gordon, Nigel G Bruce, Jonathan Grigg, Patricia L Hibberd, Om P Kurmi, Kin-bong Hubert Lam, Kevin Mortimer, Kwaku Poku Asante, Kalpana Balakrishnan, John Balmes, Naor Bar-Zeev, Michael N Bates, Patrick N Breysse, Sonia Buist, Zhengming Chen, Deborah Havens, Darby Jack, Surinder Jindal, Haidong Kan, Sumi Mehta, Peter Moschovis, Luke Naeher, Archana Patel, Rogelio Perez-Padilla, Daniel Pope, Jamie Rylance, Sean Semple, William J Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,024 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1009 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 169 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 12%
Researcher 119 12%
Student > Bachelor 99 10%
Student > Postgraduate 53 5%
Other 183 18%
Unknown 279 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 237 23%
Environmental Science 120 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 6%
Social Sciences 48 5%
Engineering 41 4%
Other 196 19%
Unknown 320 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#262,552
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#245
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,266
of 248,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.